Cancer survival in Africa, Asia, the Caribbean and Central America (SurvCan)

You are here: Home / Statistics / Comparative statistics by cancer site (ICD-10)

You are here: Home / Statistics / Comparative statistics by cancer site (ICD-10)

Comparative statistics by cancer site (ICD-10)

ICD-10: Comparative statistics by registry

Table 4: Site-wise number of cases, 5-year absolute and relative survival by sex and relative survival by age group

Click on country-registry for comparison

Flag	Country-registry	Registration period	No. of cases	Male			Female			Number of cases by age group					Relative survival by age group
				5-year survival			5-year survival			Number of cases by age group					Relative survival by age group
				No.	Abs	Rel	No.	Abs	Rel	<45	45-54	55-64	65-74	75+	<45	45-54	55-64	65-74	75+
	China - Hong Kong SAR	1996-2001	360	335	20.4	24.7	25	50.3	57.8	20	69	94	107	70	15.2	25.5	25.2	29.5	35.6
	China - Shangai	1992-1995	37	28	25.0	31.4	9	22.2	24.8	3	2	7	16	9	0.0	52.1	31.7	30.0	35.4
	China - Tianjin	1991-1999	47	41	60.4	73.7	6	100.0	112.3	3	4	11	23	6	101.3	77.2	79.8	77.3	75.3
	India - Barshi	1993-2000	80	71	9.7	13.0	9			9	8	22	31	10	11.4	13.2	5.3	13.8	19.4
	India - Bhopal	1991-1995	118	103	1.9	2.3	15			16	31	38	22	11	0.0	3.5	3.1	0.0	0.0
	India - Chennai	1990-1999	1017	757	11.9	14.2	260	14.2	15.6	172	259	326	200	60	21.2	17.2	13.2	8.9	4.1
	India - Karunagappally	1991-1997	33	28	7.7	9.1	5	40.0	44.1	6	3	17	6	1	0.0	0.0	11.4	21.9	0.0
	India - Mumbai	1992-1994	1902	1522	17.1	21.2	380	20.7	23.7	267	411	587	456	181	31.1	19.9	20.2	23.9	6.7
	Singapore	1993-1997	90	84	9.4	11.4	6			3	16	20	28	23	0.0	12.9	21.5	4.5	6.9
	Republic of Korea - Busan	1996-2001	87	80	14.6	17.1	7	24.5	24.8	5	18	34	21	9	20.2	53.5	0.0	14.6	0.0
	Republic of Korea - Incheon	1997-2001	51	49	25.8	28.8	2	100.0	121.7	1	5	26	15	4	102.0	14.1	39.1	0.0	33.3
	Republic of Korea - Seoul	1993-1997	170	159	24.3	28.7	11	36.4	37.8	5	33	59	57	16	40.8	35.0	24.2	29.0	38.2
	Thailand - Chiang Mai	1993-1997	69	56	23.2	25.1	13			0	3	17	26	23	0.0	33.9	39.4	14.9	21.1
	Thailand - Lampang	1990-2000	43	32	18.3	20.0	11	33.0	34.6	2	3	16	11	11	0.0	67.9	21.4	29.4	10.7
	Thailand - Songkhla	1990-1999	129	114	25.1	27.4	15	48.2	50.9	4	19	26	51	29	0.0	31.0	16.1	49.3	11.8

Graphs:

5-year absolute survival for male:
sort by country / sort by survival

5-year relative survival for male:
sort by country / sort by survival

5-year absolute survival for female:
sort by country / sort by survival

5-year relative survival for female:
sort by country / sort by survival

5-year relative survival by age group:
-45: sort by country / sort by survival

5-year relative survival by age group:
45-54: sort by country / sort by survival

5-year relative survival by age group:
55-64: sort by country / sort by survival

5-year relative survival by age group:
65-74: sort by country / sort by survival

5-year relative survival by age group:
+75: sort by country / sort by survival

Other tables available:

- Table 1:	Data quality indices - Proportion (%) of histologically verified and death certificate only cases, number and proportion of included and excluded cases by site
- Table 2a:	Number and proportion of cases with complete/incomplete follow-up and median follow-up (in months) by site
- Table 2b:	Number and proportion of cases by vital status and median follow-up (in months) by site
- Table 3:	Comparison of 1-, 3- and 5-year absolute and relative survival and 5-year age-standardized relative survival (ASRS) by site
- Table 4:	Site-wise number of cases, 5-year absolute and relative survival by sex and relative survival by age group
- Table 5b:	Proportion (%) of cases and 5-year absolute survival by extent of disease and site
- Table 6:	Comparison of 5-year absolute and relative survival of cases diagnosed
- Table 7b:	Up-to-date 5-year relative survival estimates using cohort and period approaches by site and calendar period
- Table 8:	Up-to-date 5-year relative survival estimates using cohort and period approaches by site and calendar period
- Table 9:	Up-to-date 10- and 15-year relative survival estimates using cohort and period approaches by site and calendar period